• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Electronics
  • Luggage
  • Yard and Garden
  • Office
  • Interior
  • Instructions

PrizedReviews.com

Best Buyer's Guide and Reviews

Top 10 Best NAS for Plex Servers in 2023

By William Hill · Last updated March 12, 2023 14 Comments

Plex is a well-known software solution that allows you to build your own home library of videos, images, and music for playback on any multimedia device sharing the network. Think of it as your own personal Netflix that you host right in your own bedroom or living room. Although there’s always the option of hosting the Plex server off your PC, the changing usage conditions and on-off states of a PC make this less than ideal. For this purpose, you’ll need a network-attached storage (NAS) solution that works as a consistent, always-ready server for any smartphone, tablet, laptop or desktop PC on the network to access stored media for consumption.

Best NAS for Plex 2022

A NAS is effectively a normal computer but simplified, usually being much smaller than a traditional tower PC and focusing the majority of its logic board real estate on hard drive connections. However, there are some pretty interesting and industrial-level NAS models out there that take things well beyond the home theater aspect and into the scale of public access for employees, clients and guests in general. You’d be surprised at how often NAS technology is implemented wherever you go. For example, public Bluetooth hotspots and Wi-Fi networks in certain shops that offer media through their respective apps are utilizing a form of what Plex does on a NAS.

However, choosing or building a NAS of your own can be complicated without a touch of insight into what each hardware component does and why it’s important to emphasize CPU and HDD arrays on your server whether it’s for home or business media purposes.

The good news is that assuming you’ve invested in a solid NAS to start with, any modular components after that can often be upgraded to improve performance, so if you wind up with an underwhelming load-out, it’s not the end of the world. On the other hand, a slow Plex experience on your NAS will result from a mismatching of components that will ultimately choke out the fluidity of your media-streaming experience.

In this review, we’re going to investigate a handful of the best NAS for Plex servers and help you decide which one is the best under what conditions.

Table of Contents

  • Best NAS for Plex Servers Comparison Table
  • Best NAS for Plex in Different Nominations
    • Synology DiskStation DS218+ — Best Synology NAS for Plex
    •  Synology DiskStation DS218+ — Best Two-Bay NAS for Plex
    • QNAP TS-253D-4G — Best QNAP NAS for Plex
    • Synology DiskStation DS920+ — Best Four-Bay NAS for Plex
    • ASUSTOR AS3202T — Best Cheap NAS for Plex
  • Reviews of the Best NAS for Plex Servers in 2022
    • Synology DiskStation DS218+
    • QNAP TS-253D-4G
    • Synology DiskStation DS920+
    • Western Digital My Cloud PR4100
    • QNAP TS-251D-4G
    • QNAP TS-251+
    • QNAP TS-451+
    • QNAP TVS-471
    • ASUSTOR AS3202T
    • TerraMaster F2-221
    • Synology DiskStation DS916+
    • QNAP TVS-682
    • QNAP TVS-1282
    • Thecus N2810
    • Netgear ReadyNAS RN212
    • QNAP TS-253Be-2G-US
  • Best NAS for Plex Transcoding Buyer’s Guide
    • Transcoding
    • Hardware Acceleration
    • NAS
    • CPU
    • RAM
    • HDD, SSD, RPM and Bit Rate
    • RAID
  • Plex NAS FAQ
    • What hardware is ideal for a NAS that’s running Plex?
    • How do I get my NAS hooked up to my other devices?
    • Can I add more media to my NAS to expand what Plex can deliver?
    • Are there any devices or software combinations that won’t work with a Plex-loaded NAS?
    • Why is my media buffering constantly?
  • Conclusion

Best NAS for Plex Servers Comparison Table

ProductPhotoTranscodingAccelerationCPURam (Gb)Check Price
Synology DS218+
Editor's Choice
Synology DiskStation DS218+ Review1080p4KCeleron Dual-Core 2.0-2.5 Ghz2-6 Check Price
QNAP TS-253D-4G
Editor's Choice
1080p4KCeleron Quad-Core 2-2.7 GHz4-8 Check Price
Synology DS920+
Best for 4K Transcoding
1080p4KCeleron Quad-Core 2-2.7 GHz4-8 Check Price
WD PR4100Western Digital My Cloud PR4100 Review1080p1080pPentium Quad-Core 1.6GHz4 Check Price
QNAP TS-251D-4GQNAP TS-251D-4G1080p4KCeleron Dual-Core 2 GHz4-8 Check Price
QNAP TS-251+QNAP TS-251+ Review1080pNoCeleron Quad-Core 2.0 GHz8 Check Price
QNAP TS-451+QNAP TS-451+ Review1080pNoCeleron Quad-Core 2.0 GHz2-8 Check Price
QNAP TVS-471QNAP TVS-471 Review1080p1080pCeleron Dual-Core 3.5 GHz4-16 Check Price
ASUSTOR AS3202TASUSTOR AS3202T Review720p1080pCeleron Quad-Core 1.6-2.24 GHz2 Check Price
TerraMaster F2-221TerraMaster F2-2211080p1080pCeleron Dual-Core 2GHz 2-4 Check Price

Might be Interesting: Best Hard Drives for NAS

Best NAS for Plex in Different Nominations

Synology DiskStation DS218+ — Best Synology NAS for Plex

This wasn’t the most powerful or costly Synology NAS on our list, but the reviews cited that it was the most reliable, and that’s why the DS218+ made the spot.

It supports 4K at 30FPS with the usual host of codecs to boot, and while the specs are pretty standard on RAM and CPU fronts, it’s a well-assembled device that can handle Plex hosting in your home at comfortable speeds without breaking the bank.

Read Full Review
Check Price

Synology DiskStation DS218+ — Best Synology NAS for Plex

 Synology DiskStation DS218+ — Best Two-Bay NAS for Plex

A second-time winner here, this is the most efficient solution for home Plex entertainment with two bays for holding your favorite media.

The DS218+ is a testament to the fact that you don’t need enterprise-level equipment for a quality streaming experience, and this machine handles everything from 1080p all the way up to 4K in truly effective style.

Read Full Review
Check Price

 

QNAP TS-253D-4G — Best QNAP NAS for Plex

A high-power solution from QNAP, the TS-253D packs a lot of punch in a formidably well-assembled package that doesn’t express any glaring flaws.

QNAP TS-253D-4G - Best QNAP NAS for Plex

Its support for 4K transcoding is shown effective and worth pursuing unlike other QNAP offerings on this list where the 4K was found to stutter badly despite similar specifications. There’s nothing particularly special about this NAS; it’s just that it covers middle- to high-ground territory and simply works.

Read Full Review
Check Price

 

Synology DiskStation DS920+ — Best Four-Bay NAS for Plex

Synology wins the middle ground with their solid offerings that are cited for their overall value.

Synology DS920+ - Best Four-Bay NAS for Plex

The four-bay edition of their DiskStation is, in our opinion, the most efficient balance between cost and results in a practical Plex scenario of running a home theater, and it owes to the modest hardware in tandem with the fact that Synology’s offerings just work.

Read Full Review
Check Price

 

ASUSTOR AS3202T — Best Cheap NAS for Plex

This isn’t just the most affordable NAS on the list; it’s also the most price-efficient for simple home entertainment with Plex.

ASUSTOR AS3202T — Best Cheap NAS for Plex

Its specifications aren’t top-of-the-line, but it includes an exceptional DAC in conjunction with 2GB of RAM, a quad-core Celeron and support for your standard-issue WD Red HDDs.

The reviews cite that the support for 4K transcoding is largely wasted on the Celeron’s lack of horsepower, but if you have time to wait out the buffer, it’s workable. Otherwise, 1080p should stream just fine.

Read Full Review
Check Price

Might be Interesting: Synology VS QNAP

Reviews of the Best NAS for Plex Servers in 2022

Synology DiskStation DS218+

Synology DiskStation DS218+ ReviewIf the over-two-grand QNAP solution is a little overkill for your taste, don’t worry — home-worthy solutions abound with comfy price tags and easy-to-setup configurations that support just about everything your sanctuary could need.

Synology is a prime competitor in the NAS development game, and QNAP users constantly cite comparisons between the two brands. We’re not here to say which brand is better. What we will confer upon you is the understanding that 2GB of DDR3L-1866 RAM and the dual-core Celeron J3355 clocked in tight at 2GHz are worthy contenders on the NAS market.

It supports up to 24TB of raw storage across two bays, and the RAM can be bumped up to a healthy 6GB if needed.

The transcoding supports 4K with H.264 (AVC) and H.265 (HEVC) at 30FPS, which is ample for high-quality home entertainment under the condition that you have a little time to wait out the buffer. We say this because in all honesty, it’s fully expected that you won’t have a Celeron knocking 4K media out cold.

User experience varies by individual, and there are many great reviews, but keep in mind that 4K — especially at high bit rates — may be problematic for the CPU, and that’s before we discuss the hit that cheaper drives on this level can take to the I/O threshold.

Verdict

Still, we must give glowing praise for this NAS, and we fully recommend this for home use with Plex multimedia distribution.
Pros
  • Affordable
  • Well-rounded hardware solution
Cons
  • None

QNAP TS-253D-4G

QNAP TS-253D-4GNow we’re talking serious business here. QNAP’s offering comes with utile-looking HDD bay grilles in a tactical black chassis and simplified frontal interface.

It’s not much different than the last two products, but it definitely says “power” with a certain sternness. Sold up as “professional-grade“, it brings a quad-core Celeron J4125 with Quick Sync at 2GHz and 4GB of DDR4 distributed across two SoDIMM interfaces that support up to 8GB. Once again, the promise of 4K H.264 is seen in the device specifications; the difference is that it appears to actually work on this model.

Such specifications open up an array of mirroring and extension options for multiple displays. You can effectively use this as a replacement PC if you so choose, which not every NAS can do well.

Verdict

That said, this is a well-rounded server that accomplishes much with little, and we’ll recommend it for anyone who’s willing to pay a little more for “just works“.
Pros
  • Supports 4K transcoding effectively
  • Internal components can be swapped
  • It simply works
  • Should play nice with Apple products
Cons
  • None

Synology DiskStation DS920+

Synology DiskStation DS918+ ReviewSynology returns with another compelling contender in the Plex NAS department, tolling the mid-range bell with 4GB of DDR4 RAM, scalability for up to nine storage drives and a quad-core Celeron — pretty standard stuff that we’ve all seen and heard before up to this point.

If you add the DX517 expansion unit, you can achieve the nine-drive setup from the original four HDD bays that come standard with the unit, and that’s exactly what you wanted to hear because Synology’s server solution complements its price tag with codec transcoding at 4K, 30FPS.

There aren’t any drawbacks to point out aside from the occasional criticism that the Celeron doesn’t handle transcoding as sweetly as you’d expect from a machine of this price, and that’s unfortunately understandable.

Verdict

We’ll recommend this for low-end business and university applications on the Plex front; just keep in mind that high-quality media may struggle to materialize quickly on the client end of the line.
Pros
  • Starts with four bays and can scale that up to nine with an expansion unit
  • Is generally cited as a well-rounded, reliable server solution
  • Supports 4K
Cons
  • None

Western Digital My Cloud PR4100

Western Digital My Cloud PR4100 ReviewAnother mid-ranger slides in on its knees Drew Carry-style like “yeah”: Enter Western Digital (WD).

This is the first, final and only WD option that we’re reviewing here, and it has some interesting tricks that set it apart from Synology and QNAP.

Aside from the obvious LCD screen and four bays on the front, you have the ostentatious “My Cloud” tag that means exactly what you think: This sucker supports cloud operations.

It’s also the first on here to use a quad-core Intel Pentium CPU, which is nothing special but interesting to note. That comes with 4GB of DDR3L RAM, support for every standard RAID configuration plus JBOD, and a cloud-based backup solution in case you want to save your drive array for maximum striping.

The main problem that users seem to have with it is the software: It doesn’t play the nicest with Plex and sometimes doesn’t generally work well at all.

The majority of users never mention these issues, so we’re not discouraging you from trying out the PR4100.

Verdict

In fact, we recommend it for those who strictly emphasize data backups due to the integrated cloud function.
Pros
  • Integrated cloud support makes an excellent alternative to RAID mirroring
  • Wide support spectrum for RAID options and drive expansion
Cons
  • Software may not play so nice with Plex

QNAP TS-251D-4G

QNAP TS-251D-4GDelivered in a sterile-looking, almost offensively bright chassis, this NAS borrows from near-identical design language as its other QNAP siblings.

While the CPU doesn’t look stellar at first, the Quick Sync feature should make up for the dual-core 2GHz, and in typical server fashion, it appears to be designed with ’round-the-clock efficiency on that note. Packing 2GB of DDR3L RAM out of the box, the device can be upgraded to support up to 8GB.

The TS-251D is cited as ideal for centralized management, allowing you to store everything from text files to audio and more with access through USB or the network according to your needs. As a Plex server, we think this is pitched as more of a business solution, but there’s no reason off the top of our heads that this couldn’t double over as an entertainment server on the side. That’s all the more evidenced by the H.264 codec support combined with 4K hardware transcoding, which is an impressive spec on paper. H.265 would’ve made this a more formidable machine, however.

One of the issues that some people are finding with QNAP’s machine here is the lack of processing power despite Quick Sync’s transcoding acceleration. A simple truth about CPUs is that hardware acceleration only goes so far before the inherent bottlenecks of general processing become apparent, and Celerons are definitely not high-end processors by any means.

The idea with a server architecture is that processing efficiency is as important as the effectiveness because servers are left on constantly. It seems that QNAP may have undercut the CPU effectiveness here not just with a Celeron but an unreasonably underpowered one at that. We’re not asking for a 12-core Xeon, folks; we just want the 4K promise lived up.

Verdict

We’ll recommend this machine for general file-sharing on the lower end of a business environment. It feels like a NAS that should handle Plex at moderate output metrics if you keep the videos under 1080p, but depending on conditions, you can make it work out. There might be an issue with transcoding to specific formats, and QNAP will need to review their architectural decisions to overcome this.
Pros
  • Great general-purpose centralized sharing device
  • Comes with a bevy of software features to boost performance in specific cases
  • Should work nicely with Apple products in particular
Cons
  • The CPU is more than a little underwhelming with high bit-rate transcoding, especially at higher resolutions, but not everyone experiences this

QNAP TS-251+

QNAP TS-251+ ReviewNow this feels a little more like home entertainment. With a remote control included right out of the box, you already know there’s some serious business involved on the comfort level.

The chassis is a funky mix of stylish and functional, bearing a USB 3.1 port on the front alongside the hardware keys and colorful status lights in a carbon color-schemed shell.

Running on hardware transcoding, supporting up to 6Gbps (bits, not bytes) SATA drives and capable of handling gigabit LAN, this is a formidable NAS. The TS-251+ comes in two types that combine two- or four-bay HDD parking with 8GB of RAM. This is clearly designed to be straddled across home- and business-level applications.

QNAP packed a quad-core 2GHz Celeron with Quick Sync under the hood, and the memory bays support classic DDR3 or DDR3L SoDIMMs for up to 8GB total as restricted by the logic board. The 8GB is an acceptable ceiling if a little low for industrial use, and pushing low-voltage RAM out of the box — as many servers tend to — suggests that the machine is initialized for low-end users.

The good news is, you always have the option of swapping the RAM out for a competitive brand such as Crucial. You’re also getting Virtualization Station and Container Station in typical QNAP style, which allows you to run simultaneous Windows- and Linux-based VMs with containerized apps.

Downsides to note are that the TS-251+ tends to cut out every so often, dropping the Plex server and axing surveillance footage. It also tends to lose its IP address on the network, forcing you to replug the Ethernet line to gain its footing once more. You’ll also want to ensure that this little machine has plenty of breathing room; the Celeron makes it a little hot inside the chassis.

Verdict

We recommend QNAP’s NAS solution for anyone who needs a basic, flexible and reasonably powerful server solution for Plex.
Pros
  • Flexible hardware options and starting model provisions
  • Comes with a plethora of software solutions out of the box that maximizes Plex among other server uses
  • Synergizes with Apple products
Cons
  • Tends to drop out of the network every so often for no apparent reason

QNAP TS-451+

QNAP TS-451+ ReviewWith yet another QNAP to review, we’re now looking at a four-bay offering with the usual rigmarole: quad-core Celeron, 2GB DDR3L RAM at a maximum of 8GB, Virtualization Station for VM instances and Surveillance Station to use the NAS as a storage solution for on-premises feeds.

There’s no mention of 4K codecs here, so it looks like this NAS will be sticking to good ol’ 1080p, which is still sufficient for most people. Also worth noting is the inclusion of AirPlay support for Apple devices in addition to Chromecast and Bluetooth, making this a mighty fine wireless option for your home server needs.

This model is identical to QNAP’s 251+; the only difference is the two added bays. With that said, the same problems apply here as they did on the 251+, namely network cut-outs that seem to happen for no apparent cause.

Verdict

We recommend this if you need extra bays for storage, and since 4K isn’t supported, you likely won’t rely on striping. As before, this is a solid solution for basic Plex needs around your home with more storage space.
Pros
  • Flexible hardware that can be upgraded as seen fit
  • Several on-board software solutions to assist with surveillance and running virtual machines
  • Plays extra-nice with Apple products
Cons
  • Again, tends to drop out of network environments, cutting off surveillance feeds and ditching Plex connections in the process

QNAP TVS-471

QNAP TVS-471 ReviewTaking a radical dive in QNAP’s design language, you now have this tiny box with a readout screen and a very utile-looking set of HDD bays — four of them.

The price tag should tell you up-front that this is poised to be an excellent Plex solution on the enterprise level in addition to other features. And QNAP is no slouch when it comes to on-board software features for surveillance, virtual machines and other needs that a server ideally fills.

From the outset, the inclusion of Real-Time Remote Replication (RTRR) already screams “made for businesses“. It’s a feature that allows business-level backups to be performed in real time, and you can manage to share content as needed.

Geared for 10Gbps Ethernet with a uniquely efficient storage environment makes 4K I/O and transmission a breeze provided the correct drives and connection are available. This thing is even promoted for use as a standard PC with QvPC on board to let it run locally for the user in addition to background server support. Of course, it wouldn’t be a great NAS without full-volume AES 256-bit encryption to boot.

Here’s a pleasant surprise: It doesn’t use an Intel Celeron this pass around. Instead, it relies on an Intel Core i3 clocked at 3.5GHz and split into two cores. This runs next to 4GB of DDR3 — not the low-power stuff but the normal, performance-grade material — that can be expanded up to 16GB, which is considered an optimal figure for enterprise-level NAS systems, especially if you’re running high-grade Plex operations on board. To top it all off, you have the ever-expected HDMI port, which would have been a real bummer to leave out on such a nice device.

Verdict

We recommend this product for powerful business-level Plex distribution of 4K media.
Pros
  • Powerful 4K transcoding
  • Efficient drive controller makes I/O operations a breeze
  • Four bays
Cons
  • None

ASUSTOR AS3202T

ASUSTOR AS3202T ReviewPacking a quad-core Celeron, 2GB of RAM and 112MB/s on read and write speeds, this server is a standard beginning hardware choice for hosting a Plex multimedia environment.

The CPU isn’t exceptional, but this isn’t intended for enterprise-level use. Surprisingly, the AS3202T comes with an onboard DAC for high-quality audio decoding through the USB hub, and it supports the H.265 codec for punching out 4K HDR content through HDMI 1.4b. You have two- and four-port varieties to choose from, which can be complemented with a RAID 0, 1 or 10 setup as you please.

From the surface, this is already sizing up to be a decent recommendation in the multimedia hosting realm that slides in on an acceptable price tag.

However, there are a couple small details that are worth noting. This machine isn’t especially good at knocking out high bit-rate transcoding on videos at 1080p and beyond, and this gets worse as you scale up on the resolution. You may also run into complications with the power plug falling out easily although this appears to be a minority complication.

A number of users have cited that the machine as a whole tends to lag with music and video in addition to terrible app support to these ends, raising the question of ASUSTOR’s software choices as they pertain to bottlenecks in the system.

Verdict

The majority of users recommend this product and haven’t found a reason to shun it, so we’d like to honor the AS3202T with a recommendation to anyone who needs a simple and affordable Plex multimedia hosting experience for their home.
Pros
  • Supports two- and four-bay design schemes with RAID 0, 1 and 10 possible
  • Inbuilt DAC for drastically improved audio clarity
  • Beautiful chassis
Cons
  • Some say that the DAC is wasted on this device due to poor software support on audio and video playback
  • The Celeron struggles with high bit-rate 1080p video, which only becomes more limiting as you attempt to transcode up to 4K

TerraMaster F2-221

TerraMaster F2-221Well, here’s a new name in the NAS game: TerraMaster. Is it terrifying? Is it the master NAS unit? We’re not entirely convinced, but all accounted, it looks like a reasonable unit for the price. At a relatively conservative price tag, you’re getting an expected hardware bundle with 2 GB of low-power RAM and a Celeron that’s advertised at 2 GHz.

We emphasize the point that it’s advertised because Celerons that are used in NAS units are normally around the 1.2-1.8 GHz range as base frequencies while the mid-2’s are the Turbo Boost results, and you can never really count on the CPU consistently running that high because they’re not rated to run consistently at anything better than their original clock on average. This raises a red flag on Terramaster’s marketing scheme, but we digress.

The HDD interface — unspecified, we’ll add — is said to run at a “blazing fast 110 MBps“, which we’re here to tell you isn’t impressive today but might’ve passed some high marks about six years ago. This lends the impression that the NAS is actually outdated on the whole and hasn’t had its specifications updated in recent years.

However, it does have some of the must-have niftiness that you expect of a reasonably contemporary NAS:

  • BTRFS file system
  • AES hardware encryption
  • Compatibility with smart TVs

Oh, you’re confused about that last part? Yeah, we were just speculating that this unit might be particularly outdated, and now it’s all contemporary suddenly. It’s almost like TerraMaster exaggerated on the hardware capabilities twice in one pass. We bet you really want to buy this product now!

Want to hear something else? The customer service for this product is almost nil. It’s a little higher than that — around the zero, nothing and nada marks to be exact. We’re not saying it’s a bad product because all accounted, the ratings are pretty good and the offerings are fairly solid for the price, but we’re putting on our tinfoil hats to call shenanigans on TerraMaster’s attitude toward customers.

Little issues like these raise big questions like, “How can I trust that this NAS will still run in 12 months?” There are also problems with upgrading the RAM, and the system is said to crash and even come preinstalled with malware.

Verdict

That said, if you’re not bothered by the misleading specifications and don’t plan to trade a word with TerraMaster’s customer service, you might actually find that this is a good little device for knocking out your everyday home Plex needs. We’re just going to say right now that it’s difficult to recommend this in light of user remarks and our own observations, but if you’re looking to try something that isn’t QNAP or Synology, far be it from us to stop you.
Pros
  • Reasonable hardware at a reasonable price
  • Software snapshots allow you to undo unwanted changes to your data
Cons
  • Suspiciously misleading specifications sheet
  • Customer service is forgettable

Synology DiskStation DS916+

Synology DiskStation DS916+ ReviewThis particular NAS from Synology is focused on encryption and intensive tasks.

One would assume that means Plex should run wonderfully on it since “intensive” would accurately describe high-bit 1080p, 1440p or 4K content on a regular basis.

Starting out with four bays isn’t a bad measure on its own, and the added support for DX513 suggests that quite a bit of data will be handled by the system with a full nine drives running at once.

The 2GB base RAM will almost certainly need a boost once you get your hands on this; nobody buys enterprise-level equipment at this price tag to experience memory crashes. You also have quad-core Pentium N3710 with Quick Sync on board to make the transcoding life much easier.

The added wonders of singular H.264 4K or triple-transcoding with 1080p over the network is a strong selling point for heavy-handed media file-sharing through Plex, but the Btrfs file system — while great for text files and PDFs — probably isn’t going to prove as useful for Plex.

However, since NAS boxes are useful for more than just Plex, you might catch yourself wanting to take advantage of the security suite that would benefit from such a file system. That’s fine, but expect to run into licensing issues that outrageously inflate the price of compatible hardware such as cameras. That’s before we get to how the software handles the feeds, which is highly inefficient on the cores.

Verdict

This is a fine offering from Synology that we can recommend if you want a nine-drive array at a low dollar cost and an efficiently designed system for heavy Plex transference, but you may encounter issues if you use it as a surveillance solution.
Pros
  • Swell 1080p and 4K transcoding
  • Original four HDD bays can be expanded to nine
Cons
  • Surveillance suite is expensive and inefficient
  • 2GB of RAM out of the box is a little weak for what this machine was designed to handle

QNAP TVS-682

QNAP TVS-682 ReviewTaking things yet another notch higher, you have the TVS-682: a beast of a machine with a beast of a price tag.

The first detail you’ll take note of is the incremental design bump from the aforementioned 471, which seems to be a trend leading from one model to the next.

This one, almost as small as the last, now has two dedicated SSD ports in addition to the four inbuilt HDD bays, totaling six drives for high-speed, high-capacity storage and I/O operations. In addition, you have an Intel Core i3-6100 (Skylake) clocked at 3.7GHz, 8GB of DDR3 RAM right out of the box and three PCIe expansion slots to add a little functionality on the side.

Honorable mentions include not one or two but three HDMI outs, one with HDMI 2.0, all of which support smooth 4K playback. Virtual JBOD also allows you to further expand the storage capacity of this NAS beyond what’s normally allowed by the SATA ports and SSD M.2 ports.

Finally, you have the all-too-cool QvPC feature, which allows you to use the server as you would a standard PC. Any standard operating environment can be used for this purpose whether it’s Windows, Mac, Android or Linux.

The first drawback to look out for is the lack of file versioning in this particular system, which makes it a little too easy to accidentally overwrite a file with a branched version that stemmed from the same original copy. Rather than consolidate the files or otherwise separate them, it mashes them together and causes the second upload to walk over the first, resulting in losses to the first set of edits that were uploaded.

This is almost unforgivable in a machine that costs as much as the 682, but with Plex servers, it might be acceptable since overwrites are more prolific with PDFs and text documents — in other words, items that are frequently updated.

Verdict

With that out of the way, do we recommend the QNAP TVS-682? Indeed we do: This NAS comes with high power, lots of RAM, plenty of storage vertical and more IO than you can transcode butter-smooth 4K with. We have a winner.
Pros
  • Powerful transcoding CPU with Quick Sync that runs on a recent architecture
  • Plenty of fast RAM out of the box, making it great for enterprise-level multitasking
  • QvPC and other software features to streamline multi-faceted functionality
  • Four HDD bays and two M.2 SSD ports for high-speed and high-capacity I/O
Cons
  • With files that you plan to overwrite such as text files, be careful with simultaneous user access with intent to edit the file since there’s no file versioning embedded in the system

QNAP TVS-1282

QNAP TVS-1282 ReviewWith eight HDD bays, four SSD ports, a quad-core Skylake Core i7 and expandable memory up to 32GB, you’re already dealing with an absolute monstrosity in terms of capacity and processing power off the bat.

This is before we mention the usual additions by QNAP: QvPC for the desktop PC experience with any operating environment of your choice, triple HDMI outputs with full support for 60-frame 4K to compatible displays, VJBOD to further extend your storage capacity and plenty of RAID support for mirroring, striping and everything in between to secure your data and hasten I/O operations.

Controlling it all is the option to use server apps on the NAS itself, remotely from a device with the necessary software, or with a few clicks of the included remote. It’s a beautiful thing despite the cost.

In addition, you’re getting three PCIe slots for custom expansion, four-LAN support and a 10G-ready system with iSCSI to boot.

Now, you’re probably wondering about the downsides, and there’s, unfortunately, one area that the manufacturer Q-napped on: general quality. The system works great, but many users cite that the fans are unacceptably loud. Yes, it’s understood that with a Core i7 under the hood along with so much RAM and up to 12 drives, there’s a lot of thermal to distribute, but for one fan to work so hard at regulating all of this was a terrible mistake in the opinion of some.

For us, we think that it’s frown-worthy but not necessarily a deal-breaker; after all, not everyone plans to keep it in rooms that will be frequented.

On the other hand, as a Plex device, the noise could be a problem. Now, we don’t expect anyone to use this in a house. The hardware is pitched as a definite enterprise-level machine that’s designed to push professional results out, but Plex servers are designed for entertainment and therefore aren’t taken as seriously as the servers that are usually kept buried in server rooms.

What we’re trying to say is that as a Plex server, it’ll do wonderfully with 4K transcoding and delivery, but it could create a problem for any environment where it’s kept because of the sheer whine that’s created by the fan. It’s cited as unbearable and enough that the whole system needs to be quarantined to a separate room entirely to deal with it, but then again, not everyone has this issue.

Verdict

This machine is certainly a praiseworthy recommendation that can handle literally anything you throw at it, including the most demanding of Plex media at 60FPS, 4K HDR at any bitrate you desire. Yes, it’s quite the beast. However, you might want to keep it in another room away from people; the fan can create quite the interference.
Pros
  • Extremely powerful CPU, RAM and storage hardware solution to hold and transcode everything you could want
  • Includes a bevy of software features to help it double as a powerful surveillance system and more
  • Plenty of room for hardware expansion with three additional PCIe ports and other tricks that improve on the storage capacity and processing efficiency
Cons
  • A fairly significant number of users report that the fan whine is seriously harsh

Thecus N2810

Thecus N2810 ReviewAre you looking for an alternative to your QNAP or Synology? Did you really think there were other quality offerings on the market that break the mold of our favored dichotomy?

Well, you might have been right about that one: Thecus brings a solid multifunctional unit to the table that supports 4K transcoding and playback, inbuilt malware protection and superb customer support to boot. Thecus’ product is sold through an authorized reseller, SerenIT, so there’s more comfort to fill your soles with should you feel uncertain about purchasing anything that isn’t “mainstream” enough.

The system comes with ThecusOS 7.0, which in addition to the malware protection should help you steer clear of anything that might try to get ahold of your data. We don’t ever really hear about NASes being targeted by malware, but on a network on many devices that run different operating environments, it’s entirely possible that someone’s malicious code might find its way onto your server sooner or later, so kudos to Thecus for fleshing out that possibility; it should go lengths to secure customer faith.

The hardware interface for the memory modules is, of course, a wholesome DDR3; this does also mean that the system is at least a few years old, so despite the N2810’s seemingly cutting-edge appeal, it wears its wrinkles to show for its longevity.

The whole thing is powered by a dual-core Celeron with two bays, each apparently supporting up to 4 TB a pop. The most interesting part of this unit, however, is the negotiable price tag. While the base price listing does touch on the high end some, you can apparently get ahold of SerenIT and argue with an underpaid representative about how equally underpaid you feel and that you’d like a 50 percent discount. We’re actually not sure how that works, but hey, you can always give it a try and see if you can haggle it down.

Verdict

What can we say? It’s a solid rig driven by decent hardware with a unique brand behind it. We just think it costs a little too much considering the two-bay structure, dual-core CPU and lesser-known branding. The lack of Android also makes for an unfamiliar experience.
Pros
  • Supports 4K playback and transcoding thanks to relatively recent hardware
  • Runs a unique OS with an inbuilt anti-malware program to secure your data
  • Preinstalled with a plethora of apps to handle pretty much all of your multimedia needs
  • You can apparently haggle the price down if you call the provided customer service number
Cons
  • The starting price, at least before you haggle SerenIT’s service reps, is a little on the high side considering the upper limits of the unit’s hardware modifications and the lack of Android

Netgear ReadyNAS RN212

NETGEAR ReadyNAS RN212 ReviewWe’ll bet you didn’t know that Netgear made NASes! Well, okay, it is expected that Netgear would make network-based equipment, and that’s what a NAS is after all.

Say what you like about your past experiences with Netgear equipment, but this looks like a solid offering across the board, and the price cleaves on a cool spot for the out-of-box performance although we question how a RISC processor will handle NAS operations, especially in the long run.

RISC CPUs, which are typically found in smartphones and tablets, aren’t designed to handle heat to the same extent that the traditionally fan-cooled CISC Celerons and Atoms are designed to; as such, being RISC, there’s a potential risk — sorry, had to — with regards to performance and longevity. However, the whole package looks promising.

The CPU, which is a Cortex A15, was a solid piece of tech back in the early 2010’s. RISC CPUs aim to leverage efficient coding procedures and lightweight OS requirements to make up for the ultra-low-power throughput, which intuitively leads to less potent processing oomph in the bigger picture. While RISCs aren’t known for failing any more frequently than their CISC brethren, they’re usually placed in units that aren’t cooled by anything but sheer contact with stagnant air, so we’re left to wonder how in the world you’re supposed to transcode media in 2022 with a tablet-level processor from 2012.

Then again, with a little awesomeness behind your software, anything is possible with hardware, and it looks like Netgear’s ReadyNAS is a reliable unit for up to 1080p transcoding. Of course, 4K would be a little much to expect given the power inside.

Other technical points to take note of are the dual gigabit Ethernet ports for double throughput in Link Aggregation mode, the usual and expected BTRFS file system on board and native Plex support to boot. This all comes backed up with Netgear’s cloud service, which uses a portal for secure access on Windows, Mac, Android or iOS. You can set up a private cloud for backing up your data or as an extension to your NAS’ physical storage. We’d say that’s a major benefit for anyone who’s trying to host for their home or office environment.

Verdict

Overall, while the customer support isn’t the best ever, this is cited to be a great backup NAS for less demanding applications and can easily serve as a primary NAS if you don’t mind funneling 720p to 1080p tops for your videos. Everything else should work reasonably well, and the setup is lauded for being quite intuitive. We’ll recommend this if you need a low-power solution that’s quick to get rolling and does the job quietly and efficiently.
Pros
  • Easy to set up
  • Power-efficient and very quiet thanks to the RISC CPU
  • Good bang for your buck
  • Comes with cloud storage included
Cons
  • The RISC CPU limits the transcoding horsepower to 1080p
  • Customer support is lame, but hopefully you won’t need it

QNAP TS-253Be-2G-US

QNAP TS-253Be ReviewQNAP comes in strong with its signature horsepower-driven edge on hardware as shown with 4 GB DDR3L RAM out of the box next to a quad-core Celeron J3455 that’s clocked at 1.5 GHz base with Turbo Boost up to 2.3 GHz when fewer cores are utilized.

This is supposed to support hardware transcoding of up to 4K content, so you’re getting a well-rounded punch on horsepower with this unit. Of course, that means the HDMI port on board is also capable of supporting 4K, but we don’t expect you to be quite as excited about that part.

There’s also a SATA III interface for 3.5-inch drives of up to 6 Gbps, two gigabit Ethernet ports for planet-to-planet teleportation, and an inbuilt speaker just in case you didn’t bring your own. You have access to a single PCIe port for 10 Gb Ethernet compatibility, which means you can effectively download the whole solar system in a flash and host it from your exabyte hard drive in about 100 years. There are also system snapshots to keep the system and its data groomed in case you mistakenly muck up some of your files. Yep — the whole hard- and software package is here, and it’s as good as ever.

You may find that the fan noise with this unit is a little over-the-top, which some cite as a deal-breaker in this model. However, the main problems, few and far between as they may be, are software-related and seem to boil down to some unresolved conflicts within the code. More than likely, it’s all thanks to the 0’s and 1’s leaning toward the outdated side of things, which some users feel is cause for running virtual containers to host your servers. A bigger issue is the little stuff — you know, like updating the metadata on your photos, music, and videos.

You’re not recommended to use QNAP’s inbuilt software on this particular NAS when you’re modifying tags and such since it can result in the playback applications from even reading these files to begin with.

Verdict

With those points out of the way, this is a solid machine at a good price, and don’t let the Celeron fool you: It’s more than adequate to handle multitasking arrangements while running virtual machines and hosting containerized servers. That’s rather impressive as these aren’t feats that every NAS with this hardware is able to manage. Whatever QNAP did right with this one, they did it well. Of course, that could explain the incredible fan noise that some find with their unit. We wholly recommend this NAS if you can keep it someplace where that won’t be an issue.
Pros
  • Great hardware out of the box that supports 4K hardware transcoding
  • Inbuilt speaker if that matters to you
  • By whatever sorcery, this machine does the whole “complete PC experience” nicely with excellent RAM management and CPU utilization, which is also a bonus to actual Plex hosting
  • Software screenshots protect your data from mishaps
Cons
  • The software is a little outdated in this model, which may lead to problems hosting some content unless you containerize it
  • The fan noise might be bothersome

Best NAS for Plex Transcoding Buyer’s Guide

Transcoding

This is a term that’s used to describe on-the-spot compatibility alterations to a video file before streaming it to a client. Transcoding a video is like changing the language that it’s communicated in, allowing the client device to receive the information quicker or on terms that it can understand.

It’s a CPU-intensive process, and Plex servers are largely centered on transcoding operations to be successful, so you’ll need a fairly competent CPU in your Plex NAS to make it hum.

Hardware Acceleration

This is nothing more or less than having a dedicated piece of hardware to boost processing power in specific situations or with specific tasks. This is normally achieved with co-processors, graphics processing units (GPUs) and specialized RAM that occupies a noncontiguous area of the logic board apart from the normal memory that would be used for general applications.

When looking for hardware to deck out your Plex NAS with, you’ll want transcoding hardware acceleration on your CPU if you can.

NAS

Network-attached storage (NAS) is storage space that’s accessible through a local internet connection. This is used by enterprises to compartmentalize storage solutions according to user sets, allowing specific profiles and devices to gain access to this storage for reading or writing.

As it pertains to using Plex on a NAS, you’d install Plex to the NAS itself or on interacting client devices so the contents of the NAS can be transcoded and distributed to other devices on the local network. A NAS with a potent CPU is ideal for Plex transcoding, which in turn is essential for distribution to your media devices.

CPU

The central processing unit (CPU) is a hardware component that forms the brain of the system, processing all inputs into corresponding outputs. CPUs are never as linear as just clock frequency (gigahertz [GHz]) or the number of cores involved.

There are finer architectural differences such as caches, pipelines, instruction sets and more that define the CPU’s overall ability to function effectively with different types of information. For example, some people excel at math while others excel at spatial recognition, critical thinking, and risk assessment. It is in this way that CPUs are similarly categorized and equipped to systems that require specific processing strengths.

RAM

Random access memory (RAM) is temporary storage space for apps, programs or media that have been recently accessed and are being held open so you can pick up where you left off.

When you’re shopping for hardware to deck out your NAS with, RAM isn’t all that important with a Plex server, but it’s still essential for the system to run in the first place.

HDD, SSD, RPM and Bit Rate

The hard drive disk (HDD) stores data that’s accessed at a rate determined partially by rotations per minute (RPM). There are other determinants involved such as the actual quickness that the drive can read and write data at the given RPM as primely exampled by Western Digital’s Red drives, which are designed specifically for NAS systems.

You’ll want plenty of server space to store your media for transcoding and distribution, and an HDD with a higher RPM will be able to deliver the goods to the CPU more quickly for this purpose. HDDs on Plex servers are usually a minimum of 1TB at 7,200RPM.

If you happen to be using a solid state drive (SSD), the data rate will be measured in Mbps (megabits per second) and will typically be much faster than an HDD.

RAID

Redundant arrays of independent disks (RAID) are a means of combining multiple HDDs or SSDs so they function as a unified or contiguous hardware entity. This is normally done through RAID 0 (“striping”) or RAID 1 (“mirroring”). The former setup evenly distributes data across both drives to double the read and write speeds while the latter simply mirrors the data of the first drive to the second one.

Both are important to Plex NAS servers because a slow drive can bottleneck the delivery of media content to connected devices while a drive failure can result in total data loss. For this reason, a four-drive RAID 10 array is recommended to combine the benefits of both RAID configurations, but your server can still function perfectly fine without it.

Plex NAS FAQ

What hardware is ideal for a NAS that’s running Plex?

For home use, you’re recommended to have 1GB of RAM for every 1TB of storage and a minimum of 1TB to hold your media for hosting. You should also have a minimum CPU of an Intel Core i3, preferably of the latest generation. When you step into enterprise-level hosting, those specifications take intuitive leaps upstream: Intel Core i7, 16GB RAM and at least 8TB storage depending on the exact purpose of the server and what will be hosted.

However, these are general figures and won’t necessarily account for increased needs in cases where you need an inordinately larger amount of storage, more CPU to handle a larger number of clients and so on. Fortunately, a Plex NAS is capable of running smoothly on as little as a Pentium Celeron, 200GB of storage and 512MB of RAM. These are really small figures in the grand scheme, but if you opt for a Plex server strictly for sharing text files and SHD video, it’ll prove well-enough rounded to handle your needs.

How do I get my NAS hooked up to my other devices?

You’ll need to install Plex Server on a PC and use this to set up the NAS itself remotely on the network. After that, you should install the Plex app on your Apple and Android devices to link up with the NAS on the same local network that it’s on. The media will be received through the Plex app for viewing on your device.

You will, of course, need to plug the NAS into the network with an Ethernet cable or WiFi connection. Ethernet is recommended if you’re working with larger files such as 4K video, RAW audio and photography, or large portfolios of PDF data.

Can I add more media to my NAS to expand what Plex can deliver?

You should be able to forward information to the NAS using the Plex app or the USB connections on the NAS itself. Since you’ll require an interface to authorize transfers, the USB trick normally doesn’t work unless the machine is configured to automatically copy the contents of attached drives or you tether it directly to your PC using an adapter.

Are there any devices or software combinations that won’t work with a Plex-loaded NAS?

Every device should work with a Plex-loaded NAS. Apple, Android, Linux and Windows devices of all operating environments should work just fine, including all versions of all browsers and media players. The idea behind a NAS transcoder is that any file format can be tailored to the requirements of client devices whether the restraints are on resolution, bit rate, file type or codec levels.

However, the more transcoding that the NAS has to do to satisfy all the clients’ specific needs, the more powerful your CPU will need to be.

Why is my media buffering constantly?

This is normally due to a bottleneck in the network, drive speed or CPU. For most cases, the CPU, in particular, will be the problem, and it’ll owe to transcoding woes while the system works out what you’re viewing the content on and what format it needs to be delivered in as a result. The simplest solution is to upgrade the offending component if you can work out what’s causing the choke. Refer to the first question in this section for clarification on what you should use to ensure a smooth experience.

Bear in mind that having more clients connected to the Plex NAS may result in network- and CPU-based slowdowns. If there’s a minimal pinch of RAM in the system while a variety of different media is being accessed, the storage drive and RAM may also become choke points.

Conclusion

At the bottom of it all, a NAS is really just a PC that’s designed to support other computer devices rather than be used directly by the user. As such, the hardware under the hood is designed to run constantly, which means low heat, low noise and low power consumption.

This can be difficult to pull off while maintaining a reasonable amount of processing power, which is why hardware acceleration is important to the successful transcoding operations of a Plex NAS. Without the acceleration, transcoding becomes a difficult matter that can make or break the Plex experience, and as you now know, a Plex NAS absolutely depends on transcoding to be worthwhile.

Keep in mind that while Plex is used mainly as a multimedia server mediation and management solution, it can and sometimes is used in a business environment for sharing data among coworkers, management, and trainees. This can occur in the form of training videos.

In a similar vein of thinking, colleges and universities might use a Plex server to distribute media to students on their desired multimedia device. This media would, of course, take the form of course recaps and videos. Basically, any application that involves hosting audio or visual media — even text files — can be used in some practical capacity with Plex servers.

Going forward, you can expect to see what we’ve always seen: more improvements to processing power, memory, and storage capacity. These are the same upgrades that you’ll see to your smartphone, tablet, and PC because, well, NAS systems are PCs at the end of the day. You might wonder if there will ever be a day when we’ll see a server solution that can be hosted from a smartphone, and while it conceptually sounds like a logical step at some point, we’re not there yet.

Concerns with battery life, processing power, and data plans are interfering with the concept; at best, it can only be realized with text files and other small media at the moment.

For now, it’s hard to argue with a small box that you keep in the corner of your room on a desk. However, you always have the option of simply running a Plex server straight off your PC or laptop if you so choose. Just keep in mind that the experience likely won’t be as fluid, and if you should ever shut the system off, you’ll lose your server connection.

Related

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Albert says

    July 21, 2018 at 1:42 pm

    Hello. I noticed that QNAP TS-253A supports many additional features, for example: karaoke. Do I need to buy user license for it?

    Reply
    • admin says

      July 21, 2018 at 2:46 pm

      Hello Albert,

      Yes, this and other NAS discussed in this article support many additional features. Most of them are free. For example, karaoke you mentioned in QNAP TS-253A is free. But to use some features, you need to buy a license. But at the same time, for basic purposes – and that’s why most people buy NAS to begin with – you don’t need to purchase additional licenses. I also want to point out that any additional programs will consume NAS resources and may slow it down significantly. Therefore, when installing a program, make sure you really need it.

      Best regards

      Reply
  2. Laina says

    July 23, 2018 at 9:26 pm

    Can I get access to Synology DS218 + from the computers running Windows and Mac or am I only able to choose one option?

    Reply
    • admin says

      July 24, 2018 at 5:47 pm

      Hello Laina,

      Yes, of course, you can. NAS storage is available for Mac, Windows, and Linux users – it is their choice.

      Best regards

      Reply
  3. Benjamin says

    October 29, 2020 at 12:00 pm

    Great review. Thank you so much! For someone who doesn’t need a lot of media, what features should I look for in my NAS?

    Reply
    • William Hill says

      October 29, 2020 at 1:13 pm

      Hello Benjamin,

      Thank you for that comment. As I mentioned in this review, you should get at least 1TB of storage. While you may think that you won’t need that much memory, it’s better to be prepared. Plus, in the long run, you’ll save yourself the trouble of needing to upgrade by starting with this storage. Since we’re talking about the upgrade, I think a typical user can benefit from Intel Core i3, so remember that for your specs as well.

      Reply
  4. Carol says

    October 30, 2020 at 9:03 am

    Hey, I’m not that knowledgeable with terminologies and other techy stuff. However, we use Plex for work, and I’m wondering if I need to upgrade anything. My CPU is “Pentium,” and my memory isn’t 1TB. I think it’s only around 200GB?

    Reply
    • William Hill says

      October 30, 2020 at 9:42 am

      Hello Carol. I understand that it can be confusing with so many terminologies. As I have answered a question before, it’s better to go with the latest CPU, preferably an Intel Core i3, at least with 1GB of memory. However, if we are just talking about work, assuming you’ll only be sharing text files with your coworkers in the server, your NAS should perform without any problems.

      Reply
  5. Derrick says

    November 11, 2020 at 4:49 pm

    Hello, can you please enlighten me on why the best NAS for Plex would require a powerful CPU? If there will be many clients using Plex, I should opt for something like Intel Core i7?

    Reply
    • William Hill says

      November 11, 2020 at 5:11 pm

      Thank you for that question, and to make it simple, a powerful CPU makes the overall experience smoother. If you remember, NAS transcodes your file, so the device, format, or file type wouldn’t matter. However, understand that you will demand more from the CPU if you expect it to handle a lot of transcoding. This is why if there are multiple clients in the server, then there’s no question why you should get a powerful CPU.

      Reply
  6. Arthur says

    April 24, 2021 at 11:36 am

    I’m looking for the best NAS for Plex server, and this review is perfect! First of all, I love the way you described the pros and cons of every product. I’m looking for something powerful because I know my needs are gonna be demanding. Based on this article, I think QNAP TVS-1282 easily takes home the gold. It outshines the other products, especially for how I want to use my NAS. Besides the noise, do you have other issues with this product? I’m waiting for your green signal, and I might get this ASAP.

    Reply
    • William Hill says

      April 24, 2021 at 12:14 pm

      Hello, and thank you for this comment! May I know how you’d like to use your NAS? I see that you chose the QNAP TVS-1282 among the list, so I’m assuming you want something that can process even the most demanding media library. Oh, and you mentioned the word demanding as well. Anyway, you’ll be pleased to know that the noise is indeed the only thing I don’t like from the QNAP. However, the reason why the fan can be noisy is reasonable, in my opinion. If someday the brand will improve this NAS, perhaps using more fans can quickly solve the issue. Did I help you with this answer? Let me know if you have other queries!

      Reply
  7. Gilbert says

    April 24, 2021 at 1:01 pm

    Hello, I’m not that knowledgeable in anything tech-related, but I discovered NAS from a friend. I found this article because I was thinking of getting one. I was wondering how I can choose the best NAS for Plex transcoding if I’m only thinking of using it for my small business? I have few employees, and I think it will be convenient to use NAS. I would appreciate any additional input. Are there things to know first before buying? Thank you so much!

    Reply
    • William Hill says

      April 24, 2021 at 1:28 pm

      Hi, and I agree that NAS might be helpful for your small business. You and the employees you allowed can easily access through it to communicate with each other better. I recommend reading each factor in our buyer’s guide to understanding what model will suit you best. For example, how are you planning on using the NAS? Please check out the CPU, RAM, and HDD first to not get overwhelmed with the terminologies. Additionally, a safe NAS to get is something that uses the latest generation of Intel Core i3 with 1GB of RAM for every 1TB of storage. You also want it to have 1TB to host your media comfortably. And if you want a personal recommendation, get the best Synology for Plex like the Synology DS218+! I hope this comment helped you. If you have another question, please don’t hesitate to leave it below.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

About Author

Hello! My name is William Hill. I am a full-time author of the website. My main goal is to facilitate the process of choosing the goods and provide our readers with everything they need to make a good purchase. I wrote this article upon analyses and information obtained by a group of specialists of our website. Read More…

best hard drives for nas

Navigation

  • Comparison Table
  • Editor’s Choice
  • Best NAS for Plex 4K
  • Best Synology NAS for Plex
  • Best QNAP NAS for Plex
  • Best Two-Bay NAS for Plex
  • Best Four-Bay NAS for Plex
  • Buyer’s Guide

Copyright © 2023 · PrizedReviews.com · All Rights Reserved · About · Privacy Policy · Terms of Services · Contact Us · admin@prizedreviews.com

Some posts may contain affiliate links. PrizedReviews.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. Amazon Affiliate Disclosure